Tag Archives: ethics

Week 9: Ethics of Narrative in Medicine

*Part II Chapter 7: Attention, Representation, and Affiliation from Rita Charon, Narrative Medicine (pgs 107-130)

*Part IV Chapter 9: Bearing Witness and 10 Bioethics from Rita Charon, Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness (pgs 177-218)

*Healing Narrative: Ethics and Writing about Patients, AMA Journal of Ethics

Reflecting on what you have learned about narrative medicine so far this semester, what ethical considerations must be made when we think of narrative medicine? Some examples of ideas to reflect on include: 

-ethics of practicing narrative medicine clinically with patients (i.e. how to do so equitably)

-ethics of sharing the stories of our patients and/or colleagues and/or loved ones (i.e. issues of attention, representation)

-ethics of how society tends to share certain narratives and silence others, and why this occurs

-ethics of how healthcare systems use patient narratives (i.e. for marketing, for donors)

Are there narratives that we have encountered this semester that feel less ethical than others? If so, why?

This week, we took a step back to reflect on the ethics of narrative medicine. We began with a writing prompt: Write a story about a healthcare experience that isn’t yours to tell. We talked about what makes a story yours to tell, and different writing techniques for writing a story that isn’t yours to tell.

After briefly discussing Beauchamp and Childress’ 4 Biomedical Principles of Ethics, we launched into 3 work groups to define our own policies about Consent, Patient Care, and Marketing/Fundraising. We unpacked what best practices of using stories in these different spaces might look like and created our own standard practices for ethically using stories. Topics included de-identification in narrative and the importance of obtaining patient permission, reframing stories propagated amongst healthcare professionals, and imagining patient-centered approaches to storytelling for marketing/fundraising purposes.

We returned to the same story we wrote about earlier and wrote again: Write about the same healthcare experience as a story that is yours to tell. We reflected on how different this experience felt, and how different the stories were that emerged.

After our break, we began an informal debate to illuminate different perspectives to consider with the ethics of storytelling in medicine. Students were each assigned as patients, families, clinicians, or hospitals. We discussed stories that emerged earlier in class or scenarios that people wrote about in response to the writing purpose.

I concluded class by sharing my own imperfect framework for considering the ethics of narrative medicine:

Who- who is telling the story? Who is receiving the story?

What- what is the story being told?

When- at what time is the story being told?

Where- location of storytelling, i.e. at the bedside, in elevators and stairwells, social media

How- rhetoric, tone, language used to tell story, making space for storytelling?

Leave a comment

Filed under Narrative Medicine and Health Inequity

[AMA JOE From the Editor] “Nothing About Us Without Us”: Toward Patient- and Family-Centered Care

This article, excerpted here, is available in its entirety at the AMA Journal of Ethics

Around dinnertime on the second Tuesday of every month, a group of people gather in the Family Center at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Some are former patients, some are staff, and most are parents of pediatric patients, some of whom are deceased. They have been invited to share their perspectives and to help improve administrative decision making and care delivery.

I was first introduced to the concept patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) by this patient- and family advisory council (PFAC), an advisory body that promotes the inclusion of patient and family member perspectives in making organizational and practice decisions. As a student member over the past year, I’ve observed the dedication of these council members to improving health care culture by promoting PFCC values.

PFCC is built upon four fundamental principles: treating patients and families with respect and dignity, sharing information, encouraging their participation in care and decision making, and fostering collaboration in care delivery and program design, implementation, and evaluation [1]. At its core, PFCC is about including patients and families in all aspects of health care.

As part of a broader movement towards participatory medicine that advocates for collaborative partnerships in health care [2], PFCC means developing partnerships with patients and their families; recognizing their expertise by involving them as members of clinical care teams, advisory committees, and regulatory research boards; and promoting inclusion of patients and their loved ones in bedside and systems-level health care dialogues. Physicians can learn from patients and their families, and it is our responsibility to do so.

I first became interested in better understanding patients’ perspectives as an English major exploring disability studies and narrative medicine; I sought to understand persons’ health care experiences through their narratives. PFCC models of thinking encouraged me to broaden my scope and to appreciate the interconnectedness of patients’ and family members’ experiences. Although PFCC originated in pediatrics, the importance of families extends to all medical practice [3].

As I learned more about the tenets of PFCC and the many forms that PFCC takes in practice, I began to wonder about when and how striving to deliver inclusive care can be ethically complex. How should medicine accommodate families alongside patients, and what ethical challenges arise when trying to do so? Accordingly, this theme issue of the AMA Journal of Ethics considers some of the ethical challenges of implementing PFCC. In an attempt to make this issue as “patient- and family-centered” as possible, I invited feedback from the Mott PFAC and included patients and family members as authors…

 

Read the rest of this article at the AMA Journal of Ethics.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Miscellaneous Musings, Narrative Medicine Research

[AMA Journal of Ethics] Jan 2016: Promises and Challenges in Patient- and Family-Centered Care

Over the past year, I have had the honor of being a theme issue editor for the American Medical Association’s Journal of Ethics. I am excited to announce that my theme issue about “Promises and Challenges in Patient- and Family-Centered Care” has just been published!

As someone usually on the writer’s side of things, I’ve really enjoyed this opportunity to get a better sense of the editorial process. Patient- and Family-Centered Care (PFCC) is something I’m passionate about, and putting together this journal issue was a unique opportunity for me to further explore the field.

As an issue editor, I had the chance to reach out to national experts, write up several theme-related ethics cases, and assist in providing edits of the articles. It’s been a great way for me to delve deeper into one of my areas of interest in ethics.

Screen Shot 2016-01-01 at 2.37.48 PM

1 Comment

Filed under Miscellaneous Musings, Narrative Medicine Research

Chronicling Childhood Cancer: Ethical Considerations in Self-publishing the Work of Others

To publish a book: a dream held by many, achieved by few.

Until now. Self-publishing has revolutionized the world of books, forever altering what it means to be a published author. But what happens when an author is actually an editor responsible for a collection of works, none of which are her own?

This September, Chronicling Childhood Cancer: A Collection of Personal Stories by Children and Teens with Cancer was published. Edited by me, Trisha Paul, this collection of works consists of narratives collected from my research with pediatric oncology patients at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital.

There are a lot of questions that I grappled with throughout the publication process, and they left me filled with both excitement and anxiety. What does it mean to self-publish a book that is entirely based on the contributions of others? Perhaps nothing, perhaps something. For me, it was important from the start that the focus remain on the children and teens with cancer.

Yet as the editor of this collection and the collector of these stories, I inevitably had the responsibility of making decisions regarding this publication. How much did I want to disclose about myself as the editor? If I was not including any images of the child and teen authors, was I comfortable including my own picture? How could I adequately summarize where this idea came from in the Preface without dwelling too much on my personal story?

Throughout the process, I kept wondering whether I was overthinking these seemingly minor details, but I always found myself agreeing with my initial concerns. These questions may seem superfluous or irrelevant, but they are the kind of concerns that I have contemplated from the start. Although the book may be attributed to me as the editor, I believe that it is not I who is being published but rather each of these contributing children. By making these important ethical considerations, I was able to achieve my ultimate goal: to maintain the focus on these young child and teen authors.

Leave a comment

Filed under Chronicling Childhood Cancer: Illuminating the Illness Experience through Narrative